by
When the Supreme Court goes against all precedent to apply an inapplicable judicial standard to a case, hamstringing the president, that’s political.
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, the Supreme Court used a legal test meant to rein in the regulatory state and, instead, misapplied it to the President’s powers to manage foreign policy. This leads to an absurd outcome that leaves the President with draconian powers over foreign trade, but a limited ability to take effective, lesser measures. It is hard to see this as anything but another unjustified judicial attack on President Trump.
As to the immediate effect of the decision, Shipwrecked Crew is likely accurate:
The reality is that this decision will not end the Trump administration’s ability to use tariffs as a foreign policy tool under a plethora of other statutes:
And, indeed, he’s already begun the process.
Moreover, leaving aside the $287 billion in tariffs collected last year, two-thirds of which might now have to be refunded, the tariffs have already accomplished much of Trump’s plans to remake trade agreements across the globe.
So why this decision and why is it important?
First, to understand what is going on, here is the big picture: It begins with Art. 1, Section 1, of the Constitution, which gives Congress the sole authority to write laws. However, a century ago, progressives created the regulatory state, after which Congress, without amending the Constitution, ceded much of its authority to write laws to regulatory agencies. This has completely distorted our constitutional republic.
full story at https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/the_supreme_court_s_political_attack_masquerading_as_a_judicial_decision.html