As the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial continues to face harassment and doxxing for holding the line against activist jurors who wanted to let Lindsay Clancy walk free after killing her three children, the juror’s supporters are also facing retaliation and threats.
The long holdout was relentlessly smeared in the media by his co-jurors, who shared details of his identity and incited opposition to his position that Clancy committed a crime when she strangled her three young children. The female jurors called him “arrogant” and complained that he could not get past the fact that Clancy had “viciously killed her children.” One female juror said the holdout stood in the way of their attempt to “change something to make it better for other women.”
What makes this more ironic is that the juror, who the apparently liberal women are smearing, is a black guy and a Haitian immigrant.
It was later revealed by Michael Marcel at Fugitive TV on YouTube, who interviewed the juror, that he is a Catholic and a Republican, and “he believes he might be getting targeted because of that.”
Marcel also revealed that the juror said most of the jury, who he described as “activists,” were trying to acquit Clancy and pressure the other members of the jury “from day one” to vote “not guilty.” The juror, identified as Michael, “said he knew [Clancy] was guilty because of the evidence that he saw” and “because of the evidence that was presented in court, he said he felt that she was not insane at the time and knew what she was doing,” according to Marcel. He was the only juror who did not cave to the pressure of the “activist” jurors.
