
4 Canadian doctors gave medical exemptions for jabs and now they’re facing legal trouble
by
The court wants the physicians to hand over patient medical information and the doctors refuse to release private records.
(LifeSiteNews) — Four Ontario doctors have become the target of legal action by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) after refusing to cooperate with an investigation into why they are giving “inappropriate” medical exemptions for the experimental COVID shots.
Dr. Mary O’Connor, along with Dr. Mark Trozzi, Dr. Rochangé Kilian, and Dr. Celeste Jean Thirlwell, became the subjects of a legal filing by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario last week after they refused to hand over confidential patient information pursuant to an “investigation” by the college into why they granted medical exemptions to patients for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. The college is asking the Ontario Superior Court to mandate their compliance.
According to the college’s filing against O’Connor, the investigation concerns “her conduct in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and her completion of medical exemptions for COVID-19 vaccinations and diagnostic testing.”
Instead of releasing the records, the college contends that O’Connor insisted they must first “define COVID-19″ and that she “will not be able to move forward without the College’s precise definition of COVID-19.”
The college also says that O’Connor requested them to “advise if [the college] knows the ingredients of the gene therapy experiments, the so-called vaccinations, being administered to humanity without informed consent.”
The filing in Superior Court, which seeks to mandate that the doctors provide medical charts, patient information, and even allow investigators entry into their offices to copy or remove “necessary documents,” is set to be heard in January.
O’Connor’s lawyer, Michael Swinwood, said she will fight the case in court. “I don’t see the need for an investigation,” the attorney said. “There is no malpractice or incompetence involved.”
Trozzi echoed a similar statement as Swinwood, stating that “an Ontario doctor is free to provide medical exemptions relating to COVID-19 vaccinations as he or she sees fit.”
Going a step further than Swinwood, Canadian constitutional rights lawyer Rocco Galati previously stated in August that doctors and public servants who have mandated or promoted the shots without making a “full, true and plain disclosure of the known risks” have transgressed Canadian laws related to “criminal negligence” and “crimes against humanity.”
According to the Ottawa Citizen, the college has taken issue not only with the writing of medical exemptions but the general conduct of the doctors, specifically mentioning O’Connor’s use of the term “gene-therapy experiments” as opposed to calling the injections “vaccinations.”