WHO states sex education starts from birth, UN seeks to decriminalise sex with minors
Nicholas Creed
This is disgusting. All those ‘conspiracies’ now validated and printed in black and white. Those sick bastards. If any global threat to humanity and the social fabric of society was going to get a response from the willfully blind, surely this is it.
WHO / UNESCO report
Acknowledging this for exactly what it is – the push to legalise paedophilia. There is no excuse for the WHO or UN to wriggle out of this being a misunderstanding, or ‘out of context’.
Quoting from Zerohedge:
The 68-page report titled Standards For Sexuality Education in Europe, also calls for supplying information to toddlers about “enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body, early childhood masturbation.”
The policy paper also states that kids between four and six years should “talk about sexual matters” and “consolidate their gender identity.”
The document also asserts that sexuality is present from birth, claiming “From birth, babies learn the value and pleasure of bodily contact, warmth and intimacy. Soon after that, they learn what is ‘clean’ and what is ‘dirty’,” adding “In other words, they are engaging in sexuality education.”
The WHO told reporters that “Our guidelines reflect established psychological facts based on decades of research.”
Covering the issue, GB News reporter Mark Dolan called the development “sick” and urged that the WHO can “go to hell.”
*Note the original link to the report didn’t work. I tried several tabs on the UNESCO site but it looks like it has since been scrubbed. I found a preserved link using the way back machine linking to the PDF download – that is the link address I replaced above in the ZH quote.*
The 68 page report (published in 2010) makes for difficult reading:
On page 13, under a section entitled ‘Sexuality education in schools – as a response of societies to these social changes’:
In addition, sexual abuse scandals gave sexuality education a strong boost in the public sphere and led to calls for sexuality education for younger children. This call has been supported by a change in the perception of the child in general – now perceived as a subject.
What did I just read? Sexual abuse scandals gave a ‘boost’ to sex education for younger children – at first sounds as if there is a need to protect the child by raising awareness of abuse – then bizarrely refers to a child as a ‘subject’. They give the definition of the subject below: