Top Canadian medical journal adds term ‘greysexual’ to never-ending LGBT glossary
by
‘This is pure quackery,’ Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Coalition told LifeSiteNews. ‘The people pushing this are kooks who want to make a name for themselves, while continuing to push the boundaries of the sexual revolution.’
(LifeSiteNews) — The Canadian Medical Association Journal has introduced the term “greysexual” as the latest so-called “sexual orientation” invented by LGBT activists.
According to a paper published December 4, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, Canada’s top medical association, is now recognizing people who claim to be “greysexual,” meaning they are “experiencing sexual attraction rarely or under specific circumstances.”
“This is pure quackery,” Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Coalition told LifeSiteNews. “The people pushing this are kooks who want to make a name for themselves, while continuing to push the boundaries of the sexual revolution. There might exist an even more nefarious purpose in this strategy.”
“The LGBTXYZ brain trust has invented another, new ‘sexual orientation’ to add to the other dozens they concocted, and its fellow travelers in the medical community are carrying water for it to legitimize that people can be ‘born greysexual’, it’s inborn, that’s their core identify, and they cannot change,” he added.
The article, co-authored by Stella A. Schneckenburger, Michelle W.Y. Tam and Lori E. Ross, introduces “greysexual” as a subsection of “asexual.”
The report divides asexual into “demisexuality (only experiencing sexual attraction after emotional bonds form) and greysexuality (experiencing sexual attraction rarely or under specific circumstances.”
“Asexual people also have unique physical and sexual health needs, such as navigating arousal without attraction and learning to set boundaries in relationships,” writes the article.
The article further claims that “asexual people” often struggle with mental stress and a sense of stigma from discrimination. It notes that many “asexual people” are wary of medical care as they have been previously classified “inherently disordered” by medical staff.
To overcome this, the report suggested that medical providers “use inclusive, affirming language” such as “using ‘if’ rather than ‘when’ for questions about sex… allow patients to self-identify (and) avoid assuming lack of sex is problematic.”
“Connect patients to asexual communities; ensure approaches are asexual-specific rather than generalized to the entire LGBTQIA2S+ community,” the article added.