in World News

Appeals Court Rules mRNA COVID-19 Jab Not A ‘Traditional’ Vaccine, Mandate Interfered With ‘Fundamental Right To Refuse Medical Treatment’

By Danielle

A ruling issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declared that mRNA COVID-19 injections do not qualify as ‘traditional’ vaccines.

In a case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court ruled that mRNA COVID-19 shots are a ‘medical treatment’ because they do not prevent transmission or provide immunity.

Health Freedom Defense Fund said the state power granted under Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) does not apply to mRNA COVID-19 shots.

“HUGE!!! WE WON our appeal against LAUSD! The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the district court’s decision, writing that LAUSD’s C0v!d j@b$ mandate interfered with their employees’ ‘fundamental right to refuse medical treatment,’” Health Freedom Defense Fund wrote.

“The state power granted under the Jacobson case does not apply. More to come,” the group added.

The Plaintiffs claimed the LAUSD’s COVID-19 jab mandate interfered with “their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.”

“Their complaint’s crux is that the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ is not a vaccine. ‘Traditional’ vaccines, Plaintiffs claim, should prevent transmission or provide immunity to those who get them. But the COVID-19 vaccine does neither. At best, Plaintiffs suggest, it mitigates symptoms for someone who has gotten it and then gets COVID-19. But this makes it a medical treatment, not a vaccine,” the court’s opinion, written by Circuit Judge R. Nelson and supported by Judge Collins, stated.


full story at

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,