in World News Kamalush? Rumor: VP Harris Has a Serious Drinking Problem
Kamala Harris is known among many for word salads, bizarre cackling, odd bodily movements during speeches and, in recent times, refusing to do press conferences and interviews. Most had chalked this behavior up to incompetence and lacking ability, too. But now another explanation has come to light:
Harris, a rumor holds, has a serious alcohol problem.
In fact, relates one observer, sources close to the candidate “suggest that her aides are struggling to manage her sobriety.” This explains her schedule of limited “pre-arranged rallies” and why she often “appears intoxicated upon disembarking from flights.”
It would also explain something else: Harris’s reportedly erratic, abusive behavior toward staff. This includes berating underlings, continual profanity, and, bizarrely, forbidding junior staff from looking her in the eye. As someone I know mentioned, this prohibition makes sense if Harris’s eyes reflect inebriation, being bloodshot, glossy, and vacant.
By the way, the information about Harris’s boss-from-Hell status comes from a longtime Democrat.
Kamalush?
The rumors about Harris’s alleged alcoholism have been swirling for a while, reports American Thinker (AT). But a weekend tweet (below) from Trump campaign insider James Blair broke the story wide open.
Comments on the matter then exploded. “According to reports,” writes AT, unable to keep her away from the booze, staffers’ “only option is to try to keep her away from the microphone” (relevant tweets below).
Not surprisingly, the Democrats’ crack public relations team, aka mainstream media, swung into action, circling the wagons to defend Harris. Newsweek is a good example. It claims there’s no evidence “to support the [alcoholism] allegations, which are being pushed by Trump’s allies across social media.” The site then called the story “unsubstantiated.”
We’ve heard this before, repeatedly. The mainstream media claimed not only that the Hunter Biden laptop story was unsubstantiated, but that it was “Russian disinfo.” Except it wasn’t, as even The New York Times would eventually concede after some investigation. Quite conveniently, though, this only happened after the 2020 election — when the Truth could no longer influence the vote.