in World News The Left’s Judicial Insurrection Against Trump Is a Constitutional Crisis — Here’s Why It Must Be Stopped
Since returning to the White House in January, President Donald Trump has been met with an unprecedented legal onslaught from far-left activist judges and radical groups determined to sabotage his administration at every turn.
These rogue judges—many appointed by Clinton, Obama, and Biden—have launched a relentless legal coup to undermine the will of the American people and prevent Trump from carrying out his constitutional duties.
Appearing on The War Room with Steve Bannon, Josh Hammer, Senior Counsel for the Article III Project, warned that what America is witnessing is no ordinary judicial activism—it’s a full-blown judicial insurrection.
The full list of 125 legal challenges remains active and is documented on the Just Security website.
The Constitution and historical precedent are clear: activist judges have no authority to interfere with the President’s executive powers. The Supreme Court settled this issue in Mississippi v. Johnson (1867), ruling that courts cannot restrain the President from carrying out his executive duties.
Mississippi v. Johnson (1867) – Presidential Discretion is Not Subject to Judicial Interference
In 1867, when President Andrew Johnson was tasked with enforcing the Reconstruction Acts—despite personally opposing them—Mississippi sued, asking the Supreme Court to stop him.
The Court unanimously ruled against Mississippi, stating that a president’s executive duties are beyond the reach of the judiciary.
Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase, writing for the Court, distinguished between the president’s ministerial duties (which could be subject to judicial review) and executive/discretionary duties (which could not be interfered with by the courts).