From Rockefeller to Soros: The 100-Year Plot to Replace Citizens With Globalist Foundations
By
Mike Steger argued that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is leading an effort to scrutinize nonprofit organizations and the financial structures that allow money to move into political operations while shielding the identities of original donors.
“Scott Bessent isn’t just running Treasury right now. He’s running an autopsy on the deep state machine and their electioneering charities,” Steger said.
“A quiet political war operating behind the scenes, not polling in August, not the theater of political catwalks.”
Steger said the effort centers on following political money and determining how nonprofit structures are being used.
“Following the money, where it comes from, who controls it, and what happens when it’s scrutinized, what started as a charitable foundation over a century ago has become the financial architecture behind the political takeover and destruction of the United States,” Steger said.
Steger pointed to remarks Bessent made during a July 16 State Department meeting on political terrorism.
According to Steger, Bessent warned that legitimate nonprofit structures can be exploited to conceal illicit financing.
Steger said organizations such as Arabella Advisors and the Sixteen Thirty Fund demonstrate how nonprofit structures can move money between tax-exempt organizations and political operations.
“For 20 years, groups like Arabella Advisors have run the largest network of dark money nonprofits in the country, groups like the Sixteen Thirty Fund that exist for one purpose: take tax-deductible donations and put them into a charity, then move that money to an affiliated political operation that’s legally allowed to run partisan campaigns, and there’s no requirement to ever disclose who gave the original dollar,” Steger said.
He characterized that structure as “A shell game” and alleged that overlapping leadership allows organizations with different tax classifications to function as a single political operation.
Steger cited one example from 2024 in which he said a charity reported only $532 in office expenses and no employees while three board members simultaneously operated another group that received $20 million from the charity.
“So that’s not two organizations; it’s one operation wearing two different tax statuses,” Steger said.