Animal Rights Activists Defend Muslim Migrants Killing Animals
by
They never cared about animals or the environment.
Order Daniel Greenfield’s new book, Domestic Enemies: The Founding Fathers’ Fight Against the Left: HERE.
After horrifying images of Muslim migrants who had invaded the Spanish North African territory of Ceuta killing a baby dolphin went viral, animal rights activists rallied to their defense.
“The party rejects the instrumentalization of the suffering of a people or of its animals to foment hatred,” Spain’s Partido Animalista (PACMA) party declared. The party whose former name was the ‘Animalist Party Against the Mistreatment of Animals’, was willing to defend animal abusers as long as it advanced the greater cause of Muslim migrants invading Europe.
But that makes PACMA no different than the feminists and gay rights groups advocating for Muslim invaders to enter Europe. Baby dolphins, once the most ironic image of beleaguered animals on whose behalf environmentalists once rallied in the streets, demanding the dismantling of modern industries, and the end of tuna fishing, are now just another sacrifice.
As the siege of Ceuta continues, more images continue to emerge of the animal cruelty that typifies Islamic culture. Beyond the scenes of Muslim migrants beating a baby dolphin to death with a stick, there are more scenes of animals from house pets to geese to an octopus being killed by laughing Muslim mobs demonstrating their control over the beaches of Spain.
Local animal welfare groups report that dogs and cats have been disappearing, seagulls once plentiful on the beaches seem to be absent La Gaceta reports that the bodies of numerous mutilated cats have been turning up “missing half their bodies or pierced with an awl, as well as abused cats”. Islamic scripture is particularly negatively disposed towards dogs, the best friend of civilized man, however cruelty to a wide range of animals has become commonplace in Muslim societies whether these animals are considered ‘clean’ or ‘unclean’.
Unlike geese and seagulls which are being eaten by the invaders, cats appear to be taken and tortured for sport by Muslim migrants who may have anticipated inflicting their cruelty on the local population in Ceuta only to find them barred in their homes and are torturing cats instead.
Some local workers report that the migrants “kill them for pleasure.”
While some social media reports claim that the migrants have been eating cats, doing so would be a violation of Islamic law. The killing of cats appears to be purely malicious.
But what is truly revealing beyond the savage cruelty is the willingness of animal rights activists and leftists to excuse it.
“We shouldn’t focus on the dolphin when people are starving,” a Spanish TV hostess insisted, and “must focus on the migrants” who are only trying to survive. “Of course I love marine life, I’m passionate about dolphins… but focusing on the dolphin when there are people starving kids on the streets is just misplaced.”
In reality, the invading migrants are not starving, nor as she falsely claimed, dying of thirst.
“They’re not hungry, I can tell you that, because they’re fed every day,” a cleaning worker said.
Starving people don’t have the energy to parade around a baby dolphin for the cameras on their $900 iPhones for half an hour before finally killing it.