Can Pres. Trump Beat The Cheat?
by
The game is on.
Serious suspicions have arisen about the validity of the 2026 election: “Was this a 2020 rigged election all over again? For millions of everyday Americans who put their faith in the ballot box, that is not a wild conspiracy theory; it is the screaming, unaddressed elephant in the room. How are we supposed to look at sudden, unexplained shifts in long-standing conservative strongholds and swallow the official narrative without choking?”
The Democrats appear to have flipped dozens of congressional seats in the midterms, with many states shifting hard to the political left — news that is almost too good to be true for America’s party of Socialism and Jihadism, especially after the 2024 repudiation of Biden/Harris policies, which were nowhere near as extreme as those proposed by the current slate of Democrat politicos.
In the last three Texas gubernatorial elections, Republican Greg Abbott received around 4.5 million votes. The Democrat candidate could only muster around 3.5 million ballots statewide, until this year’s jump to 5.2 million! An estimated 9.9 million ballots were cast in the 2026 Texas midterm election, compared to 8.1 million in the 2022 midterms, an increase of 1.8 million. The result was an electoral sweep by the Democrats of all statewide offices. A recent Truth Social post by Trump suggests there was fraud. In response to Trump’s post, Kupe Paul on X wrote, “We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm… for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front-loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It’s the same pattern in every state that went blue.”
As Democrats take victory laps, three things are in place to safeguard the integrity of the 2026 midterms: 1) Executive Order 13848, empowering the Director of National Intelligence to assess foreign interference within forty-five days of a federal election; 2) Trump’s giving Americans notice, on July 16, 2026, that “[s]tarting during the 2020 election cycle, the People’s Republic of China carried out what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history”; and 3) Harmeet Dhillon’s dispatching “1,000 election monitors” to observe the elections.
No later than December 18th, the DNI will hand President Trump a report. Then, within 45 days of having received this assessment, the following will occur:
[T]he Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies… [will find out] the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results…
This time around, Trump has the right people in place to watch the elections and generate hard evidence of any vote-stealing. There was a time when Democrats “mocked President Trump” for his creation of Space Force, the military branch now tasked with securing space-based Internet systems against cyberthreats — including the possibility that a foreign actor may hack America’s Internet-connected voting systems. Were Democrats against having a Space Force, because they saw an existential threat in its ability to monitor Internet-based satellites during elections? Indeed, if an enemy, foreign or domestic, is caught flipping votes inside of Internet-connected voting machines in federal elections, it is possible that a military court could hear the case.
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, during his confirmation process, answered a line of questioning by Senator Lindsey Graham, who asked whether “American citizens who collaborate with the enemy are considered enemy combatants,” to which Kavanaugh replied, “They can be.” Kavanaugh confirmed during questioning that such matters may indeed be handled by the military, in accordance with cases like Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Johnson v. Eisentrager.