Tyranny – Hate Speech
Tyranny, Not COVID-19, Is America’s Most Dangerous Virus
As we entered into this confrontation with the pandemic, I stated during a Facebook Live event that I hoped we would not take a “carpet bombing” approach in seeking solutions to protect the American people.
What do I mean? When you carpet bomb — also known as saturation bombing — a target, yes, you will hit the desired target, but you will also cause much collateral damage to the area. Therefore, we developed precision guided munitions for the modern battlefield.
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/allen-west/tyranny-not-covid-19-americas-most-dangerous-virus
This is what Democrat TYRANNY looks like: Calif. city filling in skate park with sand to keep people out because ‘muh coronavirus’
In the same week President Donald Trump issued new guidelines to reopen the country running again as the coronavirus pandemic begins to subside, one Democrat-run city spend a lot of taxpayer money to fill in a skate park — to ensure ‘social distancing’ rules were being followed.
Allen West: Liberty or Tyranny? We Have a Choice to Make, America
Last week former President Barack Obama appeared with his former Vice President “Basement” Joe Biden in a video conference. I was truly taken aback when Obama referred to what is happening in America as an “awakening,” a “movement.”
It was at that moment that I reflected upon how Obama and his administration responded to a real awakening — a movement that occurred during his presidency.
“Hate Speech” and the New Tyranny over the Mind
Leading restriction advocates want not only to banish “hate speech,” but also to criminalize it. In the words of Mari Matsuda, an influential professor at the University of Hawaii Law School, “[F]ormal criminal and administrative sanction—public as opposed to private prosecution—is also an appropriate response to racist speech.”2
Mari J. Matsuda, “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story,” Michigan Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 8 (August 1989), p. 2321. Jeremy Waldron also suggests that written “hate speech” should be criminalized and not remain only a civil tort. Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012), pp. 45-46. The influential feminist academic Judith Butler of Berkeley University similarly thinks “that there are probably occasions when” individuals should “be prosecuted for their injurious speech.” That “hateful, racist, misogynist, homophobic speech should be vehemently countered seems incontrovertibly right.” Judith Butler, “Burning Acts: Injurious Speech,” in Deconstruction Is/In America: A New Sense of the Political, ed. Anselm Haverkamp (New York: New York University Press, 1995), p. 139.
Perhaps most surprising, legal precedents that would bring this revolution fully into existence in America are already embedded in two areas of our legal system: antidiscrimination and harassment laws, and Supreme Court rulings favoring sexual liberation that are based on a new view of “dignity.”
https://www.heritage.org/civil-society/report/hate-speech-and-the-new-tyranny-over-the-mind
Why Laws Against Hate Speech Are Dangerous
There is a tendency, to censor certain viewpoints because they might “offend” others. The problem is, it is not the inoffensive things that need protecting; it is only the offensive things that do…. Freedom of speech exists precisely to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15256/hate-speech-laws
Trudeau’s secret plan to tax your home: Wheels are already in motion
Justin Trudeau’s plan to take up to half of the profits from the sale of your home began back in 2016 when he started making Canadians report the sale of their homes to the Canada Revenue Agency.
LINK: Sale of your principal residence
Canadians know that whenever the CRA gets involved it can only mean one thing: More money out of their pockets.
https://www.conservative.ca/trudeaus-secret-plan-to-tax-your-home-wheels-are-already-in-motion/
Share on Facebook Tweet about this