58 New Studies Demonstrate Today’s Warming Isn’t Global, Unprecedented or Remarkable
Has anyone else been noticing scientists have stopped using “hockey stick” style temperature graphs to represent global warming?
The last 5 months have been alarming to global warming proponents. 58 additional peer-reviewed papers and 80 new graphs have been published on global warming in scientific journals.
These new studies are contesting the firmly held idea of the earth experiencing a dramatic shift in weather patterns. In other words, “hockey stick” temperature graphs are now making a shocking alternative point if created using recent peer-reviewed scientific data.
Environmentalist love to claim people opposed to global warming hysteria are science deniers and downright ignorant. But, do these studies actually prove it’s global warming supporters who’re the real science deniers?
New scientific studies are failing to provide support of global warming. 58 new peer-reviewed papers published in scientific journals found this alleged problem isn’t global, unprecedented or significant in nature.
New research cause scientists to state global warming is primarily hysteria stroked and egged by liberal media and politicians.
Succinctly, then, scientists publishing in peer-reviewed journals have increasingly affirmed that there is nothing historically unprecedented or remarkable about today’s climate when viewed in the context of long-term natural variability.
Some geographical areas have warmed slightly over the past 100 years. Some geographical areas have been cooling over the last several decades. Most geographical areas are completely in align with slight weather deviation trajectories recorded for the last 500 years. Look at the graphs. Read the studies. The science is clear.
Büntgen et al., 2017
“Spanning the period 1186-2014 CE, the new reconstruction reveals overall warmer conditions around 1200 and 1400, and again after ~1850. … Little agreement is found with climate model simulations that consistently overestimate recent summer warming and underestimate pre-industrial temperature changes. … [W]hen it comes to disentangling natural variability from anthropogenically affected variability the vast majority of the instrumental record may be biased. …
The truth of the matter is that global warming isn’t going to plunge the Earth into sudden obliteration. Bill Whittle, perfectly illustrates this point in a video calling out Bill Nye called “What if All the Ice in the World Were to Melt?” How long do you think it might take for all the ice in the world to melt? Head over and watch Bill Whittle expertly answer this and many more questions on this topic by clicking here.